InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2013

Re: harding0 post# 399708

Wednesday, 03/29/2017 8:31:03 AM

Wednesday, March 29, 2017 8:31:03 AM

Post# of 797139
thank you for mentioning this.Not to distract from ROLG recent article, which appears to be well reasoned from a legal standpoint. By all rational and legal thought the Lambeth decision was very questionable and the results of its subsequent appeal that followed .........well likely not legally but politically based ( perhaps related to Ginsburg obligations).The point being, more often than not the law can be manipulated and "spun" to to make a decision that sounds legally based but is otherwise following some else's agenda, be it politically and / or financially driven . The Perry decision is an example of this. Many very knowledgeable people frankly predicted (ROLG, Epstein, Howard, etc.) that the appeal would NOT be affirmed. Yet it was. Thus although articles such as ROLG's on surface are positive for shareholders, they also must strongly be evaluated in the context of the big picture surrounding the GSE's ( see Obit's diagram and comments on this).