InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 259
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2017

Re: None

Sunday, 03/26/2017 5:16:59 AM

Sunday, March 26, 2017 5:16:59 AM

Post# of 796422
How greater have the odds gotten that SPSPA will be ultimately voided and all prior payments including dividends returned?

If one thinks about it deeply,

Hypothetically assuming this NWS does fund Obamacare, and assuming it is canceled, there will be quite a bit of a blowback from people who suddenly realize that they don't have any healthcare. Since it won't be funded fully.

Assuming further, aside from the healthcare, now how would someone go about recapitalizing Fannie and Freddie?

If you simply just allow them to recap on their own with their own profits or by just canceling the NWS, then this strategy would take years would it not? Possibly multiple adminstrations? So you run the risk of another president or someone coming into power and changing policy I assume.

Further if you release them without canceling the warrants and eventually you exercise and dilute the shares, then you'd face blowback as well because people would see the government as not just stealing from privately owned companies for a long time as they did under Obama, but they'd see your administration doing the same thing, so you'd still face blowback, and you'd be considered as doing the same as Obama..

Lets give an example: Obamacare is no more or implodes because the NWS is canceled. The public is angry because they don't have or cannot afford any healthcare.

You explain to them that Obamacare was being Illegally funded by stealing from companies profits, and that canceling the NWS was the right thing to do and lawful.

Now if you do that, then you cannot keep using the funds from NWS for your own agenda and you would have to give it back to Fannie and Freddie. Otherwise you'd be hypocritical.

Also the lawsuits pending, one would assume that if this whole ponzi scheme is brought into the public light, which it would be if this is true, what other proof or evidence would the courts or judges need to see the fraud that was going on, that the government itself openly admitting it?

Knowing that, what would stop SPSPA from being voided in that case?