InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 549
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/29/2012

Re: None

Sunday, 03/19/2017 5:47:00 PM

Sunday, March 19, 2017 5:47:00 PM

Post# of 21536
Definitely not a lot of liquidity here due to low os. One solution I'm hoping is in the works is a modest forward split. After the 32-1 back split, the number of trading shares was dramatically reduced. I believe such a massive backward split was unnecessary but I've already said my piece about that. This stock can well handle anywhere between 20 and 100 million shares on the trading floor. I can't see the company reaching the required 2000 shareholders without doing something about increasing the number of available shares and, therefore, ownership possibilities. Without it,nasdaq listing is not obtainable unless there is a waver of some sort. So come on company, forward split your way to greater liquidity, greater trading volumes and happiness for all.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SNPX News