InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 506
Posts 75895
Boards Moderated 20
Alias Born 10/14/2009

Re: Scotchman post# 28957

Thursday, 03/16/2017 10:45:30 PM

Thursday, March 16, 2017 10:45:30 PM

Post# of 63186
Hi Scotchman, I do not agree with your points sir.

There is no way of knowing that the SEC is not looking into this shell Tracy hijacked, or any of the others either.

We do know he is being investigated for what the commission feels were fraudulent S-1 filings, so it is quite reasonable to think that all the shell hijackings may be under investigation as well.

A legally binding merger agreement between what, a Tracy hijacked shell of a defunct since 2009 company with McCusker now installed as the officers, and other McCusker private businesses. Not exactly a binding agreement between two separate entities. The one entity only exists as a hijacked shell with no business whatsoever.

I do not know of any suits filed by prior ORRV shareholders, nor shareholders post hijacking and fail to see how any of that matters anyway.

However there could be significant debt owed lurking in that ORRV shell.

I fail to see how a new Securities lawyer could be sued for malpractice if this "deal" falls thru.

According to McCusker's claims McCusker Holding Corp IS ALREADY trading as ORRV and has been for months now.

This is misleading and fraudulent information for the public to be purchasing shares on.

With no actual reverse merger documents filed with the Nevada SOS McCusker IS NOT trading as ORRV, the defunct Oceanic Research and Recovery shell trades as ORRV. Period.