Sptnws, thank you for the clarification…..
My “qualm,” if you will, with your post was two-fold:
1. You stated something emphatically as a fact, when by your own admission it was not necessarily a fact, but your opinion. That’s fine! Opinions are welcomed; facts are even better. Just trying to keep the two from becoming blurred.
2. Who posts what on RB is of no significance to the Integral Technologies iHub board – the two are completely separate entities and will hopefully remain that way. All the monikers you have identified may very well be one and the same person, and your assumptions one day proven correct; then again, they may not. More importantly, since neither dogmanchild nor booce0 have posted here before, introducing them as extraneous issues to this board could lend itself to further confusion. Like all public venues, we have enough of that already without purposely creating more.
This is the ‘Integral Technologies’ board and I’d like to see us spend more time focusing on both the near and long term prospects of the company, and less time on the personalities who happen to frequent this little watering hole.
You are an articulate, knowledgeable Long and this board could benefit greatly from your participation. I, for one, hope you’ll bring that knowledge to bear on the many issues surrounding this security.
Thanks again,
gktignol
My “qualm,” if you will, with your post was two-fold:
1. You stated something emphatically as a fact, when by your own admission it was not necessarily a fact, but your opinion. That’s fine! Opinions are welcomed; facts are even better. Just trying to keep the two from becoming blurred.
2. Who posts what on RB is of no significance to the Integral Technologies iHub board – the two are completely separate entities and will hopefully remain that way. All the monikers you have identified may very well be one and the same person, and your assumptions one day proven correct; then again, they may not. More importantly, since neither dogmanchild nor booce0 have posted here before, introducing them as extraneous issues to this board could lend itself to further confusion. Like all public venues, we have enough of that already without purposely creating more.
This is the ‘Integral Technologies’ board and I’d like to see us spend more time focusing on both the near and long term prospects of the company, and less time on the personalities who happen to frequent this little watering hole.
You are an articulate, knowledgeable Long and this board could benefit greatly from your participation. I, for one, hope you’ll bring that knowledge to bear on the many issues surrounding this security.
Thanks again,
gktignol
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
