InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 5005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2009

Re: A deleted message

Wednesday, 03/08/2017 8:51:24 PM

Wednesday, March 08, 2017 8:51:24 PM

Post# of 23274
mR.Biggie face it you lost the claims construction! Read it! Of course it does not mean money cannot be made off all the momo player piling into the stock who made it rise simply because they realized it was rising and piled on. Those folks who are buying do not even know what PTSC does or what the ruling says. That is how they work its a big pile on that their computer programs picked up and they bought. Maybe another 1c rise from here. I hope you are the one who actually holds onto bought shares! I need some folks who are clueless to hold so I can sell into their ignorance! I know it SEEMS like you won but as the appeals court conclusion points out it does not matter. Half of the CC was AFFIRMED so it kills PTSCs case. Anyway please buy more shares and hold them! To the moon baby!

"We affirm the district court’s construction that an “entire
oscillator” is one “whose frequency is not fixed by any
external crystal.”


III. CONCLUSION
We hold that “an entire oscillator disposed upon said
integrated circuit substrate” is “an oscillator located
entirely on the same semiconductor substrate as the
central processing unit that does not require a command
input to change the clock frequency and whose frequency
is not fixed by any external crystal.” Although this minor
modification to the district court’s construction likely does
not affect the outcome in this case, because the parties
stipulated to non-infringement under the district court’s
construction,
the proper course of action is for us to vacate
and remand. We vacate the district court’s construction
and remand for further proceedings.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News