Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[whipstick]

No worries on the confrontation, it is to be expected when discussing controversial topics from time to time.

Thank you for your read of this. I'm worried that you may not have realized it was 5 pages long.


I was wondering if you could address the main critique Epstein brings up about how the majority essentially decided to skip words in the statute to fit what they wanted the result to be.

The biggest WTF I had was on page 4 where he talks about skipping the term incidental powers when quoting the statute, essentially changing the intent of the statute as it reads by intentionally skipping the words as written..
and then using that bastardized reading as justification for the ruling..

It's that level of backflipping that seems really shady to me and I was hoping others who had better legal minds could opine specifically on that part.

thanks again for your time.