InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2014

Re: lineman68 post# 56974

Monday, 03/06/2017 4:29:15 PM

Monday, March 06, 2017 4:29:15 PM

Post# of 104482
I understand the potential benefits of the QMC method of producing dots, that's why i'm in QTMM, not Nanoco. I think on site production will make a lot of sense when companies are buying dots.

Sure, production in China would be great, but not going into the situation with hat in hand. The Chinese government and GTG invest (risk) money in QMA, what is QTMM investing (risking) in QMA? Their IP.

There's no reason the current San Marcos facility wouldn't be able generate revenues that would allow QMC to start production in China and own more than 25% of the company in a reasonable amount of time...if anybody wants the dots they can make. If QMC put up half the funds and owned 50% of the venture it'd seem a lot more secure.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.