InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 5005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2009

Re: Prudent Capitalist post# 22104

Saturday, 03/04/2017 2:46:40 PM

Saturday, March 04, 2017 2:46:40 PM

Post# of 23274
The changes were minor as the appeals court said and will likely not change the outcome they also said. The problem is there are 2 separate limitations in the claims construction. They each alone potentially kill your case. The appeals court changed one that might help you but left one (bolded) that kills your case.

From the appeals doc this is the construction you wanted:

An oscillator “that does not require command inputs to change frequency and excluding external crystals/clocks to generate a clock signal.”

This is the construction by the district court that was appealed:

“an [oscillator] that does not require a control signal and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal.”

Here is the appeals court claims construction:

“an oscillator that does not require a command input to change the clock frequency and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal.”

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News