InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 3907
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/28/2010

Re: RockoTaco post# 50577

Friday, 03/03/2017 10:52:21 AM

Friday, March 03, 2017 10:52:21 AM

Post# of 140475
I am doing a lot of research to prove my own thoughts wrong. I have found pictures , posted pictures , seen comparisons.

When someone says the patents are worth 4$ a year ago at 100 million shares and then you have 200 million shares and the argument is the patents are worth 4$ there is still some quant that is missing.

the shares are whats important to value if you are a shareholder.

The other stuff is great and fine and sounds good. But shareprice is what matters.

How can you quantify any factor of investment return if you do not analyze shares. Connections with verb are great and i hope it is true. If they have an idea to buy Titan 6 months ago for 1 nbillion if they get to FDA , but they also have to take your 50k shares and decrease the value by half than that is bad for shareholders. Good more the company because they succeeded but not great on the back end