InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 4019
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/28/2012

Re: Unkwn post# 147955

Friday, 03/03/2017 10:29:18 AM

Friday, March 03, 2017 10:29:18 AM

Post# of 151692

By the way, Ryzen in my opinion shows just how capable Samsung's 14nm process actually is.




it takes >1.4V to get 4GHz out of this chip. Kaby Lake can do 5GHz at sub-1.4V. Even the 22nm Haswell-E 8 core chips could do 4.6GHz at 1.4V...


Our initial preview of the Core i7-7700K used an older BIOS on the same board and we did manage 5.1GHz using a vcore of 1.44V, however with the latest EFI, temperatures got too toasty above 5GHz, but the voltage required to hit lower frequencies appeared to be lower. Even so, those with premium cooling could expect to run a 4.9GHz or 5GHz 24/7 overclock fairly easily.

The Core i5-7600K was even better. 5.1GHz required just 1.38V, which again was easily tameable by our 120mm all-in-one liquid cooler, with temperatures never topping 90 degrees. 5GHz needed just 1.28V, and 4.8GHz, which is a 1GHz overclock over its base frequency, needed just 1.17V - the same as the default voltage with XMP loaded in the EFI. Here, even modest cooling would be adequate, which is fantastic news.



https://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2017/01/03/intel-core-i7-7700k-i5-7600k-review/8

and



http://www.anandtech.com/show/8426/the-intel-haswell-e-cpu-review-core-i7-5960x-i7-5930k-i7-5820k-tested/3

I think for high performance CPUs, Intel's 14nm+ is far ahead of Samsung 14LPP.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News