InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 682
Posts 142082
Boards Moderated 35
Alias Born 03/10/2004

Re: DiscoverGold post# 20417

Tuesday, 02/28/2017 10:00:29 AM

Tuesday, February 28, 2017 10:00:29 AM

Post# of 54865
:) You can kiss 10% stock returns goodbye
By Mark Hulbert

* February 28, 2017

Low dividend yield suggests that investors should expect less

Maybe you’re expecting the stock market over the coming decade to match its historical annualized total return of 10%.

Fuggedaboutit. We’ll be lucky if the S&P 500 SPX, -0.21% gains 4% annually on a price-only basis over the next decade or so.

This sobering forecast is based on the outsized role that dividends play in stocks’ long-term return. Assuming dividends represent the same proportion of the stock market’s future return as they have in the past, the market’s current rock-bottom dividend yield suggests that investors should lower their expectations about future total return.

How crucial are dividends? Over the past 80 years, dividends have accounted for 41% of the S&P 500’s annualized total return. And though dividends’ importance has declined somewhat in recent decades, their role has still been substantial: Over the last 15 years, they have accounted for nearly a third of equities’ total return.


This will no doubt come as a surprise to millennial investors who have cut their eye teeth in an era when the market’s dividend yield has been so low as to seem inconsequential. But the data doesn’t lie: Since 2002, dividends have accounted for 29.4% of the S&P 500’s annualized total return.



Consider what even this lower recent percentage means for the future: The S&P 500’s current dividend yield of 2.02% translates into a total return forecast of 6.87% annualized — of which price appreciation would represent 4.85% annualized.

The only way that stocks could do better would be for corporate earnings to grow faster in the wake of the market’s low dividend yields. There’s a strong basis for expecting them to do so: According to a theory that traces to economists Merton Miller and Franco Modigliani, investors should be indifferent to a firm’s dividend payout ratio, since any amount a company chooses not to distribute as dividends will be available to invest in future growth. (Miller won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1990; Modigliani in 1985.)

But there is only modest empirical support at best for their theory in recent decades. The S&P 500’s inflation-adjusted EPS growth rate has not been significantly higher when dividend yields have been lower, and vice versa.

In fact, there is some evidence that, at the individual firm level, dividend payout ratios and earnings growth rates are related in precisely the opposite way than what Merton and Modigliani predicted. In a 2003 study published in the Financial Analysts Journal, Robert Arnott of Research Affiliates and Cliff Asness of AQR Capital Management found that companies with higher dividends actually had higher earnings growth, not lower. A follow-up study found that the same was true in 11 foreign countries as well.

All of which suggests we cannot easily wriggle out from underneath the implications of the market’s low dividend yield. Your retirement planning should proceed accordingly.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/you-can-kiss-10-stock-returns-goodbye-2017-02-28

DiscoverGold

Click on "In reply to", for Authors past commentaries

Information posted to this board is not meant to suggest any specific action, but to point out the technical signs that can help our readers make their own specific decisions. Your Due Dilegence is a must!
• DiscoverGold

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.