"is what it is".......actually AIN'T what it is..
He said, she said.....is what IT is....and what it IS is heresay, nothing more or less. So far, everything you've posted, which I've seen, are perfect examples of what ppl should never believe because none of it contains anything close to evidence of wrongdoing. Obviously, politics, game playing, emotions, differences of opinions, etc etc are all reasons that ppl SAY things about others that MAY or may NOT be true. Truth be told, none of that should ever be accepted w/o a reasonable level of proof. That's why our system is based on innocent until proven guilty. BS may be guilty of 99 percent of the crimes of humanity, and still may not be guilty of securities fraud in synj. I'm not saying he is or isn't because I haven't been able to find any credible evidence of it, tho it appears he is. What bothers me and what I have learned is when I see (most especially in penny stocks) commentary that accuses or deems a ceo as a crook, and company a fraud, w/o supplying any level of proof AND at the same time, provides tons of unrelated stuff & lots of he said she said... that's when red flags go up and SHOULD go up because obviously this is a cutthroat game and one chock full of agendas. In my opinion, if anyone doesn't pay respect to that fact, very seriously, then there is ironically as much danger of fraudulent things said, as you and others are saying is true of this ceo. Not all businesses make it but that doesn't make the ceo a fraud. If he was as fraudulent as you say, for as long as you say (which I don't deny may be true) then you must also conclude that the sec is a much bigger fraud, as by now they would've gone after him. For something to be "it is what it is" requires proof, otherwise "it aint".
