InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 435
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/31/2014

Re: hostastock post# 7442

Thursday, 02/16/2017 8:50:16 PM

Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:50:16 PM

Post# of 8579
Good evening, Hostastock, and sorry to take so long to get back to you, as my three grandchildren were "grandpa-sitting" for a few hours.

Here's the hyperlink to the SEC filing I have in mind:
VHUB SEC Filing

Just look at the title of the filing, which I now copy over to this post:
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR SUSPENSION OF DUTY TO FILE REPORTS UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

As I mentioned in my response to Norfolk, this SEC filing is sufficient to confuse me as to whether or not VHUB [which only voluntarily had been doing 10Q and 10K filing in order to get listed in some higher order of OTC stock exchange or trading system, if I remember correctly] has just told its stockholders that, perhaps since it is going out of business after the PLY transaction anyway, it's not going to do any more voluntary SEC reporting. Of course, the upcoming proxy materials are required by the SEC.

I admit that I can't make any sense out of the entire VHUB picture and that both extreme interpretations (namely that we're all missing something that is favorable to the shareholders at one extreme - this would be Norfolk's stance as he accumulates shares - to the Winthers are behaving very badly at the other extreme) can have lots of holes poked in them. Hopefully, the attorney-experts who are having a look at the whole matter, with thanks to a couple of posters for taking the lead here, can figure this all out. ...or maybe it will take the proxy materials to help us understand what's really going on here.