Also I do not know what you meant when you said "If KAIR can get more reduction than required, the cost of the system in terms on percentage reduction is lower than the competition."
If the the cost per percent reduction is less than the competition how does that matter to the buyer. In other words IF, note I said IF, a competitor could sell a device for $3000 that reduced NOx 40% and KAIR can sell a device for $3750 that reduces NOX by 90%, if both qualify what incentive is there to buy KAIR's device?? Does the goverment reimbuse more? Again this is a hypothetical question as the only alternative is propane and it costs more and reduces NOx less.
FEATURED BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM