InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2014

Re: SPORT19 post# 49928

Wednesday, 02/08/2017 10:18:57 AM

Wednesday, February 08, 2017 10:18:57 AM

Post# of 140475
I think your correct about the console.

I'm still not convinced that the entire list of functional elements in the existing console design are necessary for V1.0. Which is why I'm asking P. Genova questions soon. If a fully integrated console is in the blueprints and can be sequentially integrated, while still creating a fully functional SPORT for V1.0 - and V1.0 can be submitted for FDA/CE, then why not? The "more integrated" design may be in 1.2, or 1.3, or 1.4, and it's probably all software related. Which means (IMO) that if there's a partner or buyer - then SPORT can be marketed at it's highest valuable (pre-FDA/CE) regardless of the existing build status. I think that's why McNally is having the IP researched to see how the blueprints measure up with what's in the known galaxy of IP.

I also think that they're close, if not done with the Patient Cart too. That does not mean that I think they're done with any of the sub-assembly design for the tools/exchange functionality/or any other functionality that may be designed within the Insertion Tube module.

Regards,
BK