![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Wednesday, February 08, 2017 10:18:57 AM
I'm still not convinced that the entire list of functional elements in the existing console design are necessary for V1.0. Which is why I'm asking P. Genova questions soon. If a fully integrated console is in the blueprints and can be sequentially integrated, while still creating a fully functional SPORT for V1.0 - and V1.0 can be submitted for FDA/CE, then why not? The "more integrated" design may be in 1.2, or 1.3, or 1.4, and it's probably all software related. Which means (IMO) that if there's a partner or buyer - then SPORT can be marketed at it's highest valuable (pre-FDA/CE) regardless of the existing build status. I think that's why McNally is having the IP researched to see how the blueprints measure up with what's in the known galaxy of IP.
I also think that they're close, if not done with the Patient Cart too. That does not mean that I think they're done with any of the sub-assembly design for the tools/exchange functionality/or any other functionality that may be designed within the Insertion Tube module.
Regards,
BK
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM