InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3183
Posts 208744
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/04/2004

Re: maninnepa post# 328

Tuesday, 02/07/2017 3:21:24 PM

Tuesday, February 07, 2017 3:21:24 PM

Post# of 729
No, all CALD's financials reflect is that "The preliminary purchase price allocation for ViewCentral is summarized as follows"

Then they proceed to specifically state amortized contracts of 6 years.

So only CALD knows the terms of how the $4M pymt terms are being made...as their own financials don't make any reference to the $4M being paid other than to list the $4M as the amount to be paid based on whatever terms they had with VCTL last April.

Now people can say that the noteholders took all of VCTL's assets 2 years ago...but if that's the case then CALD wouldn't be listing VCTL in their current financials and saying they made a VCTL asset purchase in 2016.

CALD's financials would instead reflect the purchase of assets from named noteholders who supposedly already owned VCTL assets at the time if that were the case and there would be absolutely no mention of VCTL in their fins whatsoever as VCTL wouldn't have still owned any assets by april 2016 if the VCTL noteholders took all of VCTL's assets already in 2015

The only way to get a clear answer is for someone to contact CALD directly and ask them to explain...as it's public info right in CALD's fins...so they have no reason not to explain!


Never buy or sell based on my posts! My posts are just my opinion!