InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 15258
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/21/2005

Re: bigstocksnbonds post# 749

Monday, 02/06/2017 12:33:43 PM

Monday, February 06, 2017 12:33:43 PM

Post# of 2127
It is a myth that holding a 2x or 3x fund long term will not perform as well as a 1x fund. It all depends on what the prices are doing. If they are increasing as they have been doing for the last 5 years except for 2015, it is much to your advantage to hold 2x or 3x funds.

When I calculate gains with 2x or 3x fund I always divide by 2 or 3, so that I can compare with 1x funds. From the table below, here are the 5 year gains.



SPY 99.4% SSO 118.4%
IWM 99.2% TNA 124.8%
QQQ 125.4% TQQQ 216.2%



The math is a little tricky, so I also showed how $3000 invested in IWM would have gained $2976; while only $1000 invested in TNA would gain $3744.

In my case I hold TNA a large part of the time, so I can leverage my money, not because I want to be 300% invested. I like to be invested near 150% for IWM. If I use TNA, I only need to use half of my cash to do that. This leaves me with the other half to invest in other things.

The way I trade however even enhances the use of 3x funds even more. I actively trade a daily chart, so I am only in the market when it is generally going up. This makes the 3x gain vs 1x even greater. For 2016, IWM yielded 38.8% while TNA gained 48.9%. Just buying and holding IWM gained only 21.6%, so a big improvement.

It takes a bit to wrap your head around these numbers, but they are real. But for sure holding 2x or 3x funds in a down turn is going to amplify the losses.



Trade the Charts and not the Heart - Expect the trend to
continue until it doesn't - Realtime is the real deal

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BRK.B News