It would be nice to hold these folks accountable and most here over time feel we have been deceived. The negotiating by McScam for jobs/etc at the expense of their common shareholders using products developed without our benefit or knowledge could be criminal and certainly showing very low ethics. Their mismanagement of current orders, paying bills, extreme rockstar salaries and bonuses and greed driven CIC seem a conflict of interest. GB no sale (and firing) and then McScam's sale to L3 should be actionable incidents. Very sketchy stuff, IMO...But...
Maybe there is something on the PP computers/servers that will show during SEC investigations. The EC was allowed, but for representing and benefit of 'The Company' not peon (non senior) shareholders.
So lots of complaints from us but who and when and how will a case be developed and tried? Paid for?
Even though Standing was allowed for Usury/insider trading/contract-loan issues some others were not. Control and comments by this court are disturbing, IMO.
"In the case of the racketeering complaint, Judge Shannon said, the connection to the Platinum Partners case was “too attenuated and is not meaningfully supported by the allegations” and lacks sufficient allegations to let the claims go forward. (WTF?)
Fraudulent conveyance claims also were shut down, he said, because there was no evidence it would benefit creditors, who were already assured of full return by the asset sale.(WTF2?)
