No, it is not a possibility.
Multiple SEC filings state TALK acquired UMS and it was a 100% owned subsidiary of TALK. And the CEO and CFO signed certifications stating that information was correct.
From the 10-Q:
"On January 29, 2016 (“Closing Date”), the Company closed (“Closing”) on the Exchange under the Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company acquired 100,000 shares of common stock of UMS held by Mr. Lee, representing all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of UMS, in exchange for issuing 106,250 shares of Preferred Stock of the Company to Mr. Lee and/or his affiliates, convertible into 10,625,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company (where each share of Preferred Stock is convertible into 100,000 shares of Common Stock). Upon Closing of the Exchange, UMS became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company’s pro-forma shares of Common stock and Preferred Stock issued and outstanding after giving effect to the Exchange was 1,875,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 106,250 shares of Preferred Stock, convertible into 10,625,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company (representing approximately representing 85% of the Company’s fully diluted Common Stock as of the Closing Date), prior to giving effect to dilution of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock by the shares of Common Stock underlying the Prospective Levy Options, Prospective Mesa Partner Warrant and Prospective Andora Holdings Warrant."
And now the CFO says it was never true? He has serious problems if so, as signing the certifications would be a crime.
AI
