InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 157
Posts 1143
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2005

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/22/2006 11:19:17 AM

Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:19:17 AM

Post# of 311068
Hello, In my previous posting.. I never suggested that SLJB made any kinda of deal with anyone in regards to a Public float.. My opinion was this. In the Past LFWK mentioned they owned more shares then what was in the float. Thus trying to prove a point that the stock of LFWK was indeed being sold naked short.. How is could more shares trade than were availalbe in the float is someone was not selling shares outa thin air.

In my opinion. The Auditing firms see's the current share structure and suggest to Sulja Brothers to avoid any chance of being accussed of doing what I feel might be considered the oposite of Naked Sort selling.. Creatng A Negative Float.. The Auditing firms advises Sulja brothers to sell enough shares to not to own more than the available public float.. That will make the SEC happy..And it could be one of the reason for the selling we have seen over the past 2 weeks.

Then once the float is no longer negative. Then a chain of events could be set in motion to force those who sold Naked Shares last summer to cover those shares at a much hiogher price.

This was just an opinion on my part.. Only a select few Insiders probably really know what is really going on or how this will play out.

I have taken the position that there are some open short positions in this stock and they will need to cover those shares.

I have what they need and I am not willing to sell my shares at current prices.. In fact I added some additional shares to my current position at .079 this a.m. Was happy to get the additional shares.

Hope all have a good and week ahead. FFB Fish