InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2003

Re: mingwan0 post# 2478

Sunday, 08/03/2003 9:53:54 PM

Sunday, August 03, 2003 9:53:54 PM

Post# of 82595
Mingwan you probably produce the most complete technical due dilligence of any one whoever put mouse to pad. Your ability to dig deep is very impressive. Thank you for all the effort you expend and then share with us dolts who do not have your capacity.

My dumb question for the day. (well at least here!)

If so many promising drugs have washed out in clinical trials after millions have been spent to get them to those clinical trial, will drug companies be willing to have an outside party examine the sample groups to determine common factors in the failure vs sucess of the test? Now granted in some cases of drug testing the dna required may not have been collected, but those surviving patients might be available for sample collection. I can't put my finger on a number for drugs that fail in the finals, but I imagine it's a few thousand a year. Does DNAP have any attraction to those drug developers as a possible salvation of all that development cost?

Question was not posed to Mingwan alone. He just deserved special mention for sharing so much with those of us who are not up to his speed on technical due dilligence. In my situation I think it's a case of artificial intelligence versus natural stupidity!

Stakddek