InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 877
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/06/2013

Re: jaymark post# 36908

Wednesday, 01/25/2017 4:48:55 AM

Wednesday, January 25, 2017 4:48:55 AM

Post# of 57061
the many reasons why KM I is still in



it is self-evident that the technology works and the
documented and legally-binding evidence tells us that
it works extremely well and to the effect that variations
such as XL are being designed and with the cumulative effect
that - as we are also told - more partners and companies are
sending more samples

and we also learn that there are custom / transportation
delays re the samples sent across the world

the slow pace looks like a part of the general success of
a technology still being finally assessed in all locations and with all oils and finally value engineered
and finally integrated with SCADA systems

and one reason to be positive has to be the specious and
pointless debate about how we would know if the
AOT had been returned ..and whether that would be
a material event or not etc etc..all of which provides some
doubters the opportunity to sound more impartial than
they are..not forgetting all the nonsense we had to read re the
Trans Canada tests and all the insistence here on failure - when the eventual facts were that the tests' timescale was determined by a power supply working at only 10% of capacity - but with results that were still impressive

KM are on record as systematising the condensate line and so on
- and my memory fails as to whether there is another XL project being conducted with a long term partner..not offshore, not a COC
...and whether this could only be KMI..

looks to me that KMI wants every inch of pipe covered with AOT (and maybe also JHS ?) ...and

maybe with a good deal being offered by QS per an entire pipeline

a deal which has also allowed QS to test AOT on ALL the oils managed by KM...



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News