InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 160
Posts 22276
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 02/07/2005

Re: garlickedskicuts post# 13220

Tuesday, 01/24/2017 4:04:31 PM

Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:04:31 PM

Post# of 47704
Where does it say Mexus can't discuss historic ounces in a PR?

Ummm, there has never been enough drilling and testing to come remotely close to proving up the ore body, so that question makes no sense. Argo drilled some holes, found the results not to their liking, and left. Mexus collected surface samples, which can only be used as indicators of what might be there at depth.

As long as it's clear they are talking about historic ounces and not 43-101 ounces they are not committing any fraud or making misrepresentations.

Irrelevant based on my above response, and the fact that "43-101 ounces" makes no sense, as MXSG is not a Cdn issuer.... nor has any company ever prepared a report that would meet those guidelines, were it to be filed with SEDAR.

Further, it was also asked if the company could make statements in pr's that are not allowed in SEC filings. That's actually quite hilarious. I'd call it a double standard. The SEC, of course, doesn't closely monitor news, websites, or message boards, but that doesn't make it OK or safe to say unverifiable things, such as they have been doing.

Hope this helps.