Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[invergaard]

You are asking me to clarify to you what is in plain English?

Why the effort to back the company by detracting (cash burn rate versus issuance of shares) when the end result is that shareholders are diluted and they are left with little transparency.

Whether the company burned cash from "services rendered" or "legal" or xxxxx, or whether the company and/or issued stock to its CEO for half a million $$$, the bottom line is that it all adds up, it was all spent, and the shareholders are left with no details as to why.

Why is Emil paid $500,000 in stock in the 3rd quarter? If he is so ever confident in the goodies, why would he voluntarily take another 10 MILLION SHARES, PLUS the anti dilution shares (what a crock) and continue to stiff shareholders who many of which have lost their arses thus far. At the most promising of times, according to the company, the share price sits at multi year lows, and adding insult to injury the CEO keeps raking in free shares at the expense of the lowly shareholders who continue to sit idle and relying on poorly written PR's for information since no other communication exists between VPLM as a company and its shareholders nor the market in general.

Make excuses all you want but if you're a shareholder and not concerned that is hard to believe.