InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 33032
Boards Moderated 86
Alias Born 03/22/2005

Re: Aiming4 post# 1017

Sunday, 08/20/2006 1:22:21 PM

Sunday, August 20, 2006 1:22:21 PM

Post# of 50837
Aiming, It looks like the last purchase of those put options was on 5-25-06, and the stock price was right around where it is now. We don't know how many puts were purchased earlier in March/April when the stock price was soaring, but most puts purchased then would have probably been quickly closed out by May for a big profit. Any purchased in May would not currently represent much/any profit to the purchaser, even though the $5 puts are technically "in the money" (they were already "in the money" in May when originally purchased).

I figure the current large put position is likely owned by - 1) longs who plan to hold their long positions through the risky FDA decision period but want a hedge (covered puts), or 2) speculators with no stock position who think the FDA news will be negative (naked puts), or possibly 3) as part of some more elaborate hedge fund strategies.


Some of the various ways to play this stock over the next several months include (from most conservative to most aggressive) -

1) No position (the 5 yr CD, chicken little approach :o)

2) Long or short position, completely hedged by protective puts or calls (no risk, but costs you the price of the puts/calls).

3) Long position, partially hedged by protective puts.

4) No position until right after the FDA decision is known, and then going either long or short (the risk here is misjudging the extent of the move / getting the timing wrong).

5) Long position, unhedged.

6) Naked puts or calls (the risk being limited to the cost of the put/call).

7) Short position, partially hedged by protective calls (the degree of the hedge determining the risk).

8) Short position, unhedged (theoretically unlimited potential for loss).
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News