InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 611
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/07/2016

Re: None

Thursday, 01/12/2017 9:19:30 AM

Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:19:30 AM

Post# of 203913
Pot Industry Exhales (a Little) After Trump’s Attorney General Pick Testifies
One cannabis investor called Jeff Sessions’ confirmation hearing a “huge victory.” Others were more measured.
by Polly Mosendz
January 12, 2017, 5:00 AM CST
When Donald Trump appointed Jeff Sessions as attorney general, the cannabis industry let out a collective groan. This week the industry, which is expected to balloon to $50 billion by 2026, got a hint of reprieve after Sessions was questioned about marijuana policy during his confirmation hearing.

One cannabis investor went so far as to call the hearing a "huge victory." Others in the industry expressed cautious optimism.

Sessions has called pot "a danger" and has long opposed legalization. "Good people don't smoke marijuana," he said last year at a Senate hearing. In an infamous quote attributed to Sessions in the 1980s, while he was being considered for a federal district judge position, he said he thought the Ku Klux Klan "were OK until I found out they smoked pot." He later apologized and said he was joking.

But the conservative Republican senator from Alabama is also a proponent of states' rights, and more than half of the states in the U.S. have legalized some form of cannabis, despite federal laws prohibiting its sale and consumption.

In his hearing, Sessions said he wouldn't "commit to never enforcing federal law" but added that "absolutely it's a problem of resources for the federal government." Recently, a spokesman for the Drug Enforcement Administration told Bloomberg that, given the growing opioid crisis, agents can't dedicate resources to monitor or curtail the distribution and use of cannabidiol products, which are technically controlled substances.

"It is notable that Sen. Sessions chose not to commit to vigorously enforcing federal prohibition laws in states that have reformed their marijuana laws," Robert Capecchi, director of federal policies for the Marijuana Policy Project, a cannabis legalization lobbying organization, said in an emailed statement. "He also recognized that enforcing federal marijuana laws would be dependent upon the availability of resources, the scarcity of which poses a problem. He was given the opportunity to take an extreme prohibitionist approach, and he passed on it."

Troy Dayton, co-founder of the Arcview Group, an Oakland, Calif.-based cannabis industry investment firm, went further, saying by email that the senator "left the door open but indicated it would be a low priority. That's a huge victory considering [Sessions'] previous inflammatory statements about this topic."

Dayton said Sessions "may be against marijuana policy reform, but he is not stupid. He knows that these cannabis laws are hugely popular, not just among Americans in red and blue states, but with his boss who campaigned in favor of these laws."

While his responses, on their face, were hardly a coup for the cannabis industry, Sessions didn't morally condemn pot smokers either.

"The United States Congress has made the possession of marijuana in every state, and distribution of it, an illegal act," he testified. "If that ... is not desired any longer, Congress should pass a law to change the rule."

The Drug Policy Alliance, an organization opposed to the war on drugs, called the testimony "wishy-washy at best." The group's senior director of national affairs, Bill Piper, added: "It is clear that he was too afraid to say the ‘reefer madness’ things he said just a year ago, and that’s progress. But he made it clear throughout the hearing that he will enforce federal law."

Your cheat sheet on life, in one weekly email.
Get our weekly Game Plan newsletter.

Enter your email
Sign Up
The National Cannabis Industry Association supported Sessions' deferral to Congress. "It's time for federal lawmakers to represent the clear choices of their constituents," Executive Director Aaron Smith said in an emailed statement. "The responsible cannabis industry has helped countless critically ill patients, contributed billions of dollars to the economy and to tax coffers, taken marijuana out of the criminal market and put it behind a regulated counter, and dealt a significant blow to international cartels and traffickers."
Sessions' remarks on pot aren't far off from what Attorney General Loretta Lynch—who hasn't pursued litigation against states that legalized cannabis consumption—said during her confirmation hearing in 2015.

"It certainly would be my policy, if confirmed as attorney general, to continue enforcing the marijuana laws, particularly with respect to the money laundering aspect of it," she said when questioned by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. "Where we see the evidence that marijuana, as I've noticed in cases in my own district, brings with it not only organized crime activity but great levels of violence."

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. LEARN MORE
by Taboola Sponsored Links From The Web
Here's Why Everyone's Obsessed With These Socks
Cup of Jo for Bombas Socks
"slippers for people who don't do slippers" - WIRED
mahabis.com
How To Fix Your Fatigue (Do This Every Day)
Vital Reds Supplement
A Radical Solution to the Dead Mall Phenomenon?
FTI Journal
How Car Dealers Get Rid of Unsold Inventory
Auto Deals Ace
Historic Photos That Been Withheld From The Public
HistoryInOrbit.com
Read This Next
Lacing Dog Treats With Cannabis Is Big Business
Weed Votes Are Already Boosting Warehouse Rents
America’s Legal Pot Economy Is Forced Underground
The Future of Cannabis Sales Is Tiny Brownies

Trump Team Said to Cancel Mattis House Panel Testimony on Waiver
by Roxana Tiron and Billy House
January 11, 2017, 2:27 PM CST
Defense secretary pick had agreed to testify at Armed Services
Cancellation said to be ordered by Trump transition team

BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP, NJ - NOVEMBER 19: (L to R) President-elect Donald Trump welcomes retired United States Marine Corps general James Mattis as they pose for a photo before their meeting at Trump International Golf Club, November 19, 2016 in Bedminster Township, New Jersey. Trump and his transition team are in the process of filling cabinet and other high level positions for the new administration. Photographer: Drew Angerer/Getty Images
A House panel abruptly canceled a scheduled appearance by defense secretary nominee General James Mattis ahead of a vote to waive a law barring recently retired military officers from leading the Pentagon.

The retired Marine Corps four-star general had agreed to testify Thursday before the House Armed Services Committee, even though that chamber doesn’t have a role in confirming presidential nominees.

The decision to cancel his appearance came from President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team, according to a congressional aide familiar with the matter.

House Democrats say many members of their party aren’t inclined to approve the waiver unless Mattis appears before the committee.

"The idea is that if we don’t hear from him, we aren’t voting for him," said Adam Smith of Washington, the top Democrat on the panel, who added that he will be urging fellow House Democrats to follow suit.

The Republican chairman of the panel, Mac Thornberry of Texas, couldn’t immediately be reached for comment on whether any House Republicans will withhold support for the waiver when the bill reaches the House floor for a vote. The panel is still scheduled to vote on the waiver Thursday, with a vote on the House floor expected Friday.

There was no immediate response from Trump transition team officials on why they asked for the Mattis appearance to be canceled.

Seven Years

Mattis retired from the Marine Corps in 2013, well short of the requirement that a military officer be retired for at least seven years to serve as Pentagon chief.

Before Mattis can be confirmed, the House and Senate have to pass legislation to grant him an exception to that law.

Mattis was expected to testify before the House Armed Services panel about the role of civilian leadership of the military. His appearance was going to follow his formal confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday morning.

While Mattis, 66, is still expected to win confirmation -- and the waiver legislation could win passage in the House and Senate this week -- the precedent being set worries some members.

Considering Consequences

“This requirement has served our nation well for the past 70 years, and only once has Congress waived or modified” it, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said at a hearing Tuesday on the waiver.

“I believe it is extremely important that we carefully consider the consequences of setting aside the law” and “the implications such a decision may have on the future of civilian and military relations,” he added.

New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has said that while she respects Mattis, she won’t back a waiver.

The House’s No. 2 Democrat, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, told reporters Wednesday he believes "the committee has a right and a responsibility to inquire of General Mattis why he thinks there ought to be a waiver, what the ramifications of a waiver are, and what importance he thinks the seven-year waiting period has."

"Now, having said that, I want to make it clear I think most Democrats think General Mattis may well be the best appointee to the Cabinet that Trump has made," Hoyer said.

But, he added, "This is not a decision that should be lightly made."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-12/pot-industry-exhales-a-little-after-trump-s-attorney-general-pick-testifies