from the main board...
td, fatboy - I choose to only respond to one of the points you have in common in your posts. But before I do I will reiterate what I said prior to our meeting with Tony.
I emailed Tony and asked to shake his hand and have him meet with me and a few other investors while he was in our backyard. He graciously accepted. If you personally get no response from DNAP you need look no further than your posting style. DNAP or Tony owe you nothing. In fact, they had rather you go away if you choose not to be patient or to badger the company or to swing or day trade. Those who choose to finish the ride will be rewarded. I'm very grateful that Tony did not have the money or backing to go the IPO route and gave us a chance here in penny land. Few of us would have had the chance if he had gone big in the beginning. He admitted to having made mistakes with TBF, et. al., but it was the only way he could go. We've made it through the hard times. Now the fun has begun.
I don't mind being called a romantic but I assure you I am no fool. I am in the business of reading people. I learn quite a bit talking to and looking a man in the eyes for 30 minutes. Tony is the real deal. After we introduced ourselves subsequent to his presentation he asked us to wait to meet until he had listened to the final speaker who was delivering the latest developments on the applications of mitochondria in forensics. He came back apologizing after 15 minutes and said it was more important to meet with us. He was approached before, during and after meeting with us by actual conference attendees but gave us preferential treatment.
He did not have to answer the questions we asked and was very thoughtful in his responses, especially to those questions which bordered on inside information. If you want to ask the "hard" questions then YOU set up a meeting and try to ask them. I said to the board that I would not ask prying or inappropriate questions. I was pleased and proud to meet with him and would have been so without asking ANY questions. He gave us plenty of information to digest, and I think we asked very good questions that allowed him to elaborate to the extent he felt was reasonable and legal.
As to the question you both had in common, if you don't know what the billion shares are for by now you simply don't absorb what we've been posting. And of course there will be dilution. Not only for us but for the company we buy or ally with. But don't you see that the initial dilution will generate exponential returns when the drug hits the market? This is the big time my friends, not your normal penny stock. Tony is not in this to make a few or 10's of millions of dollars. These drugs will be targeted to a specific patient class with a known response rate as opposed to a blanket approach that is ineffective or kills a certain percentage of the target patient population. This / these drugs will be huge and force a change in the current big pharma paradigm. If they won't work with us they will have to chase us.
Do you want to make a living off of forensics or make "obscene money" off of a drug company?
Rest easy, be patient, buy more. All JMHO, mjam
