Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:01:51 AM
VPOR didn't invent or develop the technology themselves. They bought it.
My question is: What was the reason that the developer didn't start manufacturing and selling the product themselves? Or did they try and fail?
If I remember correctly the patent had been drafted quite a long time ago.
Maybe they needed more money to continue the development or for production or for holding the patent... whatever. But if I needed money in a similar situation, a company with VPOR's (Dror's) history would be one of the last places I would look for. If I really believed in my product, that is.
What did VPOR bring to the table in this reverse merger deal? Doesn't make sense from the original company's point of view.
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM