Monday, January 09, 2017 3:16:29 PM
Do you know that the above is not true for a fact? NO
Are you making an assumption that it is not true? YES
If that is the only instance that is propelling the bullshit claim that Norat is involved in the investigation it is pretty weak.
Again I ask, please present some proof that Norat in involved in the investigation into Natario with facts not mere ASSUMPTIONS.
Okay, since the SEC does not post its investigations until they make it public then how would you know Norat is involved, talked to, suspected or anything for that matter unless you are privy to the dialogue of an ongoing confidential investigation?
The fact is, you don't know. Just making an ASSUMPTION based on a weak hypothesis.
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement AI-Empowered, Zero Trust Architecture in Its Data Centers • AVAI • Apr 29, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM