InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 5082
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2012

Re: A deleted message

Friday, 01/06/2017 4:59:26 PM

Friday, January 06, 2017 4:59:26 PM

Post# of 796303
Any plaintiff in not just one, but TWO suits against or related to the government's actions or vulnerabilities in Fanniegate can expect to be questioned on motives for delivering a mass quantity of self-serving rhetoric in the internet "space" that serves the financial purposes of such legal actions.

I certainly have no objection to anyone defending their actions to seek a settlement in any or all matters before a court of proper jurisdiction. However, when those actions appear to seek another agenda, especially when such actions maybe even include the joining of other complainants in similar or related actions in some coordinated action that could create adverse outcomes for myself or other investors, it is fully appropriate for me to express reservations about the propriety therein.

It's very simple. I have a LOT of $$$ skin in this game. I don't want my Fannie stolen any more than any other shareholder does.

JMHO.