InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 12/22/2016 10:02:46 AM

Thursday, December 22, 2016 10:02:46 AM

Post# of 165859
They are in default with the NV sos. They have till the end of the month before it is revoked.
Seems to me Dan is attempting to get this done prior to being revoked.
If he can accomplish it then he and Otto can just step down and leave the empty shell for Scott to sue for his back pay.
Of course if he does that it will just become SRSRQ.

Think it's funny how you blame Dan for unpaid fees. Obviously it was Scott who couldn't pay bills since RPA, storage,taxes etc were his responsibility.
Can really blame Dan for Scotts problems.
And again as soon as they complete the deal SRSR can add a Q and the bills will no longer matter.

Dan can pay the taxes through the new company.

There is no conflict of interest because Dans suit has to do with Dan and not the company. The company is not named as a defendant so no conflict.

Voting is not needed if there is a majority of control which I assume Dan has since he was able to fire Scott.
He doesn't need to own the shares just have the right to vote them.

I agree that people here have limited knowledge of mining.
The prior management only had experience in con jobs.
That doest mean that Dan can become a miner but I would pick an unexperienced person who wants a mine over a seasoned miner wanting to con people.

Scotts family does not give him inherited mining knowledge.
He had to bring in hired experts too. So worthless arguement.

The facts are bad enough. If you stick to them you will be much more effective.

Biggest issue for SH here is dilution needed to fix what Scott broke