"as there is nothing equitable about allowing a debtor to evade a valid obligation enforceable under applicable law."
What is a valid obligation? Isn't that the point of the 1 month extension?
You are very correct that 9.9 times out of 10 the judge would rubber stamp a situation like ours. Instead of asking yourself why this time is different, you're trying to argue that the criminals of a $1.3B Ponzi scheme could not have possibly done anything wrong on their one investment that is worth anything of value...
You're either Buff trying to get the pps down (which is unlikely (the pps going any lower) given the minimum payout we could see) or management/PP (which makes sense as they have already stupidly told us they read this board).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.