InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 147
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/14/2016

Re: abrois post# 19724

Wednesday, 12/14/2016 10:48:23 AM

Wednesday, December 14, 2016 10:48:23 AM

Post# of 54537
ABROIS. I'm not pitching Uranium here.

What I'm posting is a clear explanation as to why Ascent won't ever again see 2008 pricing of $240 or 2010's $80 or 2012's $8

Ascent may see spikes as high as $2 or maybe $4 because until someone builds a reactor small enough to fit in a car, space travel and exploration make solar a natural choice for power generation but the days of mega value are gone for the solar business until some form of major change is affected in either the alternative energy sources or in the technology itself.

With good management and great sales, Ascent may again return to above $1 but there just isn't a demand for a company that produces a product that a very small portion of the population has an interest in purchasing, especially when there is so much competition from other solar companies, harping the same message.

If you bought in above $10, odds and probability demand that you'll never again see your money again. Not in your lifetime anyway.
Your best course would be to sell out (at least partially) and invest in an alternative with better upside potential.

If you're interested in upside potential in the Clean Energy field, uranium is about the only other technology available.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ASTI News