All you have to do is take those glasses off and read everything they have done to shareholders over the past 10 years. They have CHEATED people over and over. I don't go by what someone else said. I go by facts they are held to in their own words. Their words tell me they have scammed people in the past. In Nov. 2002 they increases their shares to 60,000,000,000 (60 BILLION) and in June 2003 they do a 3000 for 1 reverse split!
Why does everyone here keep talking about a 'non-dilutive' loan when there has been nothing to substantiate that? Why are you not calling them to state facts? Oh wait, you're one of them that says this. Where is proof they won't dilute even the day they sign for the loan? Because they won't have to use shares to back the loan does not mean there won't be more dilution.
They could get the loan and do a reverse split at the same time. They had a reverse split and added to their authorized at the same time! How is that fair to anyone who was holding shares?
I know it looks like bashing, but I just want to deal in facts and all the people who have a vested interested can't see that and won't accept it. Look at all the pumpers who said where this was going once the pr came out and then they blame everyone else when they are proven wrong. I sure don't see anyone getting blasted when they pump with false information.
AI
