InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1255
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2006

Re: porscha post# 7646

Friday, 12/09/2016 9:32:23 AM

Friday, December 09, 2016 9:32:23 AM

Post# of 14644
I'm not at all troubled about the secondary - we needed $ from somewhere and we're still a low-float company. We could have foreseen this and done it at a higher level - but we are where we are. What does trouble me is how definitively we were told there would *not* be a secondary only weeks ago.

I know that only a hint of an offering can drive down a stock price and thus the terms of a secondary. But they could have simply refused to speculate on the source of funding. I don't like that they straight-out told us 'no secondary'.

Anyone have thoughts about the Fortress amendment?

~ yanqui
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MARA News