InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 113
Posts 11924
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/09/2009

Re: Jamis1 post# 53529

Monday, 12/05/2016 12:03:24 PM

Monday, December 05, 2016 12:03:24 PM

Post# of 104513
Jamis...that's pretty much the way I see all of this as well. Looks like my projection of a 1:20 minimum R/S (based on current pps) wasn't that far off (which I take no satisfaction in). But like you say, if they start pumping out some news on contracts & the like over the next few months, the increased pps could likely allow for a much smaller R/S in the neighborhood of 1:2-3 or 4, which would definitely be a much easier pill to swallow (albeit begrudgingly). As far as refining the final proxy language is concerned, I think it would help make their case by displaying some confidence in their future earnings by reducing the maximum R/S proposal to 1:10
Either way...... Bring-On the NEWS

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.