Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[DeerBalls]

Is the USPTO a Banana Republic and the IPR System a Kangaroo Court?
It's believed the three judges on the VPLM case have total discretion in making decisions.

They do not have to follow and choose not to follow legal precedents or even procedural rules regarding the (POPR)
It's interesting, in the Unified Patents' IPR they did give a response to the petitioner on the issue of subscribers in favor of the patent owner but totally declined to apply the same response in the case of Apple; the same three judges ruled over both cases.

Has the USPTO become a self ruled body with no accountability to our laws and rules and the fairness of its applications?
Since the Michelle Lee (former Google Executive) appointment, Silicon Valley has hijacked the USPTO to the patent owners' disadvantage.

The IPR system totally undermines the patent examiner's ability and credibility in granting patents when almost 50% of the time the patent allowance becomes overruled by IPRs.
It is all set up to help the Silicon Valley infringers and punish patent owners.

It is my understanding Apple files the most number of IPR's every year.  It's a much less expensive and less difficult way for the "bigs" to over come patents and defend themselves against patent infringement by "invalidating" patents via IPR.

How can the same judges apply two different standards to the same patent?

Just some thoughts from one angry shareholder out of the approximately 3000 shareholders of VPLM.