InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 224
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2014

Re: None

Tuesday, 11/29/2016 9:16:31 AM

Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:16:31 AM

Post# of 38634
Interesting thought:

"[...] the hearing in 10 days. while that sounds plausible. that is the exact reason I said I didn't believe any good lawyer would ever recommend the company filing the NDA without having details of the deal already ironed out. If IPCI doesn't like the terms they are stuck at this point. By filing they must now submit a manufacture site before the PUDFA date sometime around August. As I stated above, they know they can not fulfill the requirement of finding an approved site by then. if they dont name a site the application stands risking getting rejected. So at this point by them filing they gave away any leverage in any talks with partners. while they are waiting for 10 days for something. I do not believe its them making up their minds. Odidi, may be arrogant as you state but he is no dummy. He would have never risked filing the application and risk having it rejected without knowing a deal is imminent.

I personally can see them waiting 10 days for the partner to transfer the funds or its still being held up waiting on them to actually get Podras patent in hand which should be within that 10 period as well. that would be more logical."

Source: http://www.ipci.ca/post/let-me-tell-you-something-if-ipci-even-considers-8325497
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y