InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1624
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/24/2006

Re: Jackle post# 46259

Monday, 11/28/2016 10:06:05 PM

Monday, November 28, 2016 10:06:05 PM

Post# of 81999
Yes, I'm very certain that this is the joint proposal with Moog. It would be great to win it. We are being used to certify parts for the Air Force with Aerojet and a win with the Navy would go a long way toward solidifying SGLB's future in AM. I have not heard anything about the DARPA Phase 3 with Honeywell in the ICME framework. I look forward to hearing back from C Witty via mrbagray!
What Mark said regarding MOOG in Q1 con call.

So the work that we're proposing to do with Moog was, we were approached by them to team and put together a proposal to the navy to leverage government sponsorship in return for bringing the Moog products to market more quickly using an in-process monitoring approach. And so, what I can comment is that you are accurate that we have put together a proposal with them and as I enlisted as a name team member on their proposal. It's about all I can say with respect to the Moog proposal.

It's in other than to say that their proposed approach is in lockstep with trying to bring a new technology like a PrintRite3D in-process monitoring approach into an existing traditional market space where again they are used the manufacturing in one step and inspecting in another. Because at the end of the day, when they all do their FMEA analysis, which is Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

If they have done it right, they are going to learn that there is opportunities to incorporate a PrintRite type technology to ensure that they don't have any under inspection scenarios or in other words escapes or parse that would make it into their final end applications. So now, they have been very sharp and have a keen eye to that.



Good Luck
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SASI News