InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 2015
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/12/2013

Re: Jayyy post# 7926

Saturday, 11/26/2016 10:36:42 AM

Saturday, November 26, 2016 10:36:42 AM

Post# of 13735
Although $200 in the bank may be true, saying "The FDA DENIED all interstate commerce for this fraud" is a distortion of the facts and misleading.

First, of course there can be no interstate commerce as Sucanon cannot be sold or distributed in the US. Remember that Sucanon has never been sold or distributed in the US. Why? Because the application for over-the-counter sales was not approved because it is a drug!

Second, The FDA never said Sucanon was a fraud. There are your words and there is no basis for calling Roth or Sucanon a fraud. If Sucanon was a fraud, then why would the FDA encourage Roth to apply for approval as a drug?