InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 167
Posts 88121
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 03/08/2001

Re: famlydog post# 14450

Thursday, 07/31/2003 12:42:45 AM

Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:42:45 AM

Post# of 78729
Fam. So the credibility of New Visual is all about the receipt of new funding.

At this point and time I think that's a fair statement. Haven't received funding since Brads example over a year ago, which if example is correct, should be a no brainer to fund considering the profit line involved.

I have no other alternative in a common sense thought process but to read what has been said to me and come to that conclusion.

I'm done with my base case thought process.
That has brought me nothing but disapointment.

Never mind all the people involved in our technological development. Maybe they ... well, hmmm hoped to get on the payroll too.

Maybe you can elaborate on this. Kind of think I know what you are saying but if I'm wrong I don't want to make a statement in relation to it.

Nevertheless, there are reasons, answers and possibilities that could exsist that would explain why we haven't gotten funding yet. And yes I DO need to say the right funding package.

It's been how long since we were suppose to have funding any day now?

I suggest reading Brads profit line example again and tell me how we can't get the right funding after a year since that was stated?

but we just don't know. I am glad you made that post, but it doesn't mean its the reality.

The reality is we have no funding while other companies do who have less of a potential profit to be made that were able to receive funding.

The reality is these shares they are asking for have no safety net for shareholders to just say some day oh btw the tech isn't going to get funding so we are going in a different direction.

It can happen. OTC companies do it all the time.

I've heard the reputation card played here all the time in relation to the above statement on why that wouldn't happen.

How many of you truly had ever heard of Grieves before?

Cooper? Ketch?

To say in their industry they'd be ruined is a joke imo.

It's ALL about money.

They'd be hired in a the same amount of time it takes Steinbrenner to decide to fire Billy Martin again if he was still with us.

Ventures don't work out all the time.
People in the industry know that.
If the people are good they will be hired.

We have no funding because something doesn't add up.









Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.