Tuesday, November 22, 2016 7:37:57 AM
The Fannie Mae board voted to exchange 79.9% of equity, valid for 20 years, and a 10% SPD on any funds drawn from U.S. Treasury in exchange for a bailout backstop of as much as $100 billion. There was NOTHING inherent in this transaction that violated any aspect of constitutional law. It is a pure and simple contract transferring property between two parties, with each receiving valuable consideration. In fact, a substantial case could be made that the government got badly cheated by getting warrants worth only 4/5th of Fannie's market cap or around $6.2 B in exchange for a $100 B financial backstop arrangement.
Now if you want to argue about subsequent dealings in the Amendment 3 imposition, that would potentially be a different matter altogether. But that has nothing to do with the warrants.
JMHO.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM