My point is that GGP made a conscious decision for shareholders to preserve us then. I made good money off of it before I sold. They could have easily cancelled shares then. I think two or three hundred on the likelihood of old shareholder receiving new shares, is an ok gamble. I just hate the ambiguous language in the court documents. on the same page. Seems to say two opposite things.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.