InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 517
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2016

Re: Pan4Au post# 959

Thursday, 11/17/2016 11:12:41 AM

Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:12:41 AM

Post# of 2842
Pan, I don't think it is such a complicated scam. Here is some raw speculation for ya. Larry and Randy are the main culprits. Randy has had access to all the samples ever assayed including all samples collected by clyde. Larry provides the inquart for randy to sprinkle. Who is there to find them out? HL is a bank who know very little about mining and has paid nil attention to ecpn. chuckie is a slimey dufus who has nil real mining experience but is a good liar, stumbleton is nothing but an admin hack who knows absolutely zero about mining, smith is an over the hill geologist (probably finacially stressed) who was easily dupped by notorious mining scammer C Ager, logistica is a shipping/warehouse company which dabbles a bit in iron mining but know absolutely nothing about precious metal geology/metallurgy/mining/production.

The beauty of the above is there is little evidence of wrong doing. Possibly you could detect some inquart in the sample residue but how do you prove who put it in?