InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 112
Posts 10856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2009

Re: clearmont88 post# 9895

Monday, 11/14/2016 1:57:08 PM

Monday, November 14, 2016 1:57:08 PM

Post# of 10033
Totally false...lol...

Some he is plaintiff and one defendant.


"defendants Stephen B. Parent, Ron Haswell, Walter Doyle, Seth Shaw, Antonio Treminio, together with their spouses..."
"Company agreed to settle its claims against Mr. Shaw pursuant to, among others, the following binding terms: 1) immediate payment by Mr. Shaw to GoldSpring of $75,000 in cash; 2) dismissal by GoldSpring of the pending litigation against Mr. Shaw with prejudice; 3) agreement that the settlement shall in no way be construed as an admission of liability or fault on the part of Mr. Shaw; and 4) mutual releases by each of Goldspring and Shaw to the other from liability related to the pending lawsuit."
This one apparently never made it to the lawsuit stage...
"The Company has received no response to this offer, nor has it received any further communication from counsel to Mr. Shaw since September. In mid-October, attorneys for Mr. Shaw unilaterally attempted to induce the Company’s transfer agent to issue a replacement certificate. However, the transfer agent reported this to the Company, and the Company has instructed the transfer agent not to comply with Mr. Shaw’s wishes. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself from any claims by Mr. Shaw for such shares."

WITH SEAFARER HE WAS ALSO LISTED AS THE DEFENDANT...
"Case No. 13-CA-008467

Seafarer Exploration, Corp. vs Seth Shaw"

and THAT "Seth Shaw" was represented by no other than
"Defendant

Shaw, Seth
PAUL K SILVERBERG, Esquire
Retained"
Whatever other disagreement there was with the TA,
it was SETH SHAW that they brought a lawsuit against.
FACT.

SHOW us all where Seth Shaw is the "plaintiff"???
These were ALL disputes/suits AGAINST him...he was the DEFENDANT.






yes...let's

make sure facts are correct here


ROTFLMAO