QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[whackywinston]

Jaymark : the clear priority for the whole


venture has been to be based on one partnership with
a real producer outside the laboratory and to get as much
feedback as possible from others along the way..ie Trans Canada or Freshfield or whoever..

If the technology works, the whole thing is still bound to have glitsches, adjustments and further insights into new potential and designs

I don't see how there can be any short cuts re a big process
that everyone is getting to grips with for the first time..

so how to avoid both the optimistic sounds and then the delays ?

and if the final prognosis is both secret and fantastic, how is best to describe that ? Better to avoid referring to any longer term or more general goals ? too fluffy ?

And if you need to raise money from banks or access to any organisations - and they all see the secret and the fantastic - why not allow yourselves and us the freedom of generalised optimism ..and any concrete details which emerge and can be publicised ..? ie 20 units at a time, the ongoing deployment on condensate etc

when we have one definite sale and contract, we have Everything
but it is an everything that has been approached in the only
realistic way...slowly and truthfully and secretively - it is the secrecy which has made it all so hard, not the QS policy

do you really think any of all this - after a certain point - has been done on spec ??