InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 39
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/30/2016

Re: big-yank post# 358864

Tuesday, 11/08/2016 5:40:49 PM

Tuesday, November 08, 2016 5:40:49 PM

Post# of 799134
hm okay maybe I worded it purely or wrong then.In my answer I meant
affirm=Lamberth decision was okay->supreme court last chance(maybe)
remand->back to lamberth, prolly with instructions
Reverse->well reverse NWS or amendment.

I guess my "affirming" would be as you put it a dismiss.