InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 1222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/04/2014

Re: pearjammer post# 212510

Sunday, 11/06/2016 11:28:58 AM

Sunday, November 06, 2016 11:28:58 AM

Post# of 290030
Yes you are wrong. Here is why. The rec system would be tilted in favor of existing medical businesses such as Blum TRTC. They would be grandfathered into the adult-use market and get first crack at rec licenses. And, by law, they would enjoy an advantage over would-be newcomers. For example, current MMJ dispensaries, which already must be vertically integrated, would automatically have the authority to grow unlimited amounts of adult-use cannabis, while new market entrants would first have to prove their viability on a smaller scale before being granted the right to grow more plants. Also, only about 147 rec licenses would be permitted.. This means critical mass in MMJ profit$!!! A limited number of retail business licenses would be available, and for the first year and a half of the licensing process only existing MMJ companies in Nevada would be allowed to apply. But the measure contains no residency requirement, meaning out-of-state owners and/or investors could play a big role in the Nevada industry’s development.