Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[big-yank]

The motion was unopposed. Almost all unopposed motions would be routinely granted by the court. Why are you excited?

Personally, they could use more than 30 pages just to explain why they want to stay another case ruling, awaiting documents that MIGHT be freed in Sweeney's Motion to Compel, if is upheld. Yet, in that case, plaintiff attorneys stated in opening status reports that NO DISCOVERY was needed. No discovery = no need for ANY documents.

Could Fairholme be talking out of both sides of the same mouth? Maybe they think they can just outsmart the dummies in the Federal Court of Appeals?

Judges take note!

JMHO.